It seems appropriate to reflect on my centigrade interviews from yesterday after discussing and exploring PCP today.
I was sure that having some background information on the pupils I was due to see, would help the interviews go well? I felt confident and in control rather than previous interviews where I felt like I was fishing around for information from young people who didn’t always know or want to give it!
So, I read the report complied from their answers thoroughly, prepared (in my head) some possible avenues where I thought we might go with our chat and I assumed 2 or 3 subject areas the pupils might want to cover.
Great, I really felt like I had some background on this young person, after reading through the answers they had given I knew them a little bit and they weren’t a complete stranger. This I feel helped me to conduct two of my best (although my second was challenging) interviews.
At times I felt restricted by only being able to talk about the subjects covered in the report but it was so interesting watching them digest their results and wonder at the answers they had given a couple of months ago. That’s the part for me that I find so interesting after today’s lecture.
Kelly talks about ‘re-creating ourselves, changing if we don’t like it, the first pupil I saw yesterday was not happy that Drama, Arts and Music was her second highest scoring subject and she completely disagreed with it.
In fact, she really couldn’t understand why this subject had been thrown up at all as she had never even taken Drama. She asked if we could go through some of the question related and try to see connections. We did this, found some and the first thing she said was ‘why did I give that answer?’
She was starting to question herself and disagreeing with how she felt five months ago, to how she felt now.
Was it because she really didn’t mean to give those answers, or was it because she didn’t take it seriously enough at the time or was it because she didn’t like the result so wanted to change it?
Why not? I do it and I bet so do a lot of us?
I didn’t like my job with CS, I wanted more, so I changed things, re-created myself………….how I felt a month or so ago about Psychology has changed, why, because I’m now involved in learning about it, I’ve opened my mind to change, I am re-creating myself…………isn’t that what our roles may be……..helping and advising people to change an dre-create themselves if they want to?
Also highlighted from today’s lecture, for me, is just how useful knowing a little bit about your client can be for your first meeting. To have the opportunity to ask a client to give you a description of themselves, for me couldn’t be more interesting or more helpful – of course you need to make sure you don’t make assumptions and the information gained is used constructively, but by using yesterday as an example, it really helps to have tools to use when working with clients.
That’s how I see Kelly’s approach, giving yourself and your client tools to help, assist, guide and sometimes question themselves, their decisions, feelings and even maybe their understanding of what it is they are looking for…………………